Tom Degun: All roads lead straight to Buenos Aires for Olympic Movement

Tom Degun ITG2With London 2012 already feeling like a distant memory, 2013 has dawned.

And in the Olympic Movement, these next 12 months is likely to prove the most important and dramatic year for some time.

It is a year that will see a host city selected for the 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games, a new sport join the 2020 Olympic programme as one is almost certainly removed) and the small matter of a new International Olympic Committee (IOC) President elected.

Rather significantly, all three of these major decisions will be made within a matter of days, and all of them during the 125th IOC Session in the Argentinian capital city Buenos Aires this September.

The Session itself will take place at the five-star Buenos Aires Hilton between September 7 and 10, and the luxurious establishment should prove up to IOC standards given that recent guests include former US President Bill Clinton.

In the Olympic world, much of 2013 will consist of speculation as to what will happen in one of South America's most beautiful and cosmopolitan cities when the good and great come together under the IOC flag.
 
Buenos Aires HiltonThe 125th IOC Session in September will take place at the Buenos Aires Hilton

It is still difficult to call, as nine months is a long time in Olympic Movement, but one could make informed guesses.

In the race for the 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games Istanbul, Madrid and Tokyo are jostling to follow Rio de Janeiro as the next host city.

Spain's major economic problems have so far left Madrid's bid trailing behind the other two. But I am warned by many senior figures never to count Madrid out, especially with Juan Antonio Samaranch Junior in their ranks.

The younger Samaranch does not wield nearly the same influence as his legendary father, Juan Antonio Samaranch Senior, who served as IOC President from 1980 to 2001 and completely transformed the organisation.

But the Samaranch name does still have the support of many loyal followers in the IOC, and Junior's recent election to the IOC Executive Board could prove significant.
 
Juan-Antonio-Samaranch-JrJuan Antonio Samaranch Junior remains key to Madrid’s 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games bid

But even with Samaranch Junior, Madrid simply does not appear to have the stable economic foundations Istanbul and Tokyo do right now and that is a major factor with the IOC.

Tokyo seems the safe option having got to this stage relatively unscathed while Istanbul, looking to stage the Games in a Muslim country for the first time, has had internal trouble due to a conflicting bid for Euro 2020, which they hope has now been resolved by the radical plan of UEFA President Michel Platini to stage the continent's premier football tournament across several different countries.

The IOC Evaluation Commission, led by Britain's Sir Craig Reedie, will shed further light on the issue following their visit to the three cities in March but it is difficult to look outside Turkey and Japan at the moment.

Also on the agenda, the new sport to join the 2020 Olympic programme.

The seven bidders are climbing, karate, roller sport, squash, wakeboard, wushu and a joint baseball/softball bid.

All have been visited by the IOC, and have presented to the Programme Commission, who are reluctant to give too much away, making the contest difficult to call.

But it is fair to say that karate, squash and the joint baseball/softball bid have been the most proactive in getting their message out so far. Whether this will play a big factor is difficult to say, although it is unlikely to any harm.

karate 3Karate is one of seven bidding to make the 2020 Olympic sports programme

Equally intriguing is which sport could make way to accommodate a new entrant, and modern pentathlon will perhaps be most wary of the axe, even though any sport would understandably feel hard done by after all enjoyed successful London 2012. Either way, time, and Buenos Aires, will tell.

That brings me to the final contest in Argentina, which is perhaps the most important. The IOC Presidency.

The race to replace Jacques Rogge in one of the most powerful roles in sport is already well underway, and it won't be anything like the last one.

Rogge took the helm easily in 2001 as Samaranch's chosen successor. Rogge though, who is not exactly out of the Samaranch mould, has made it clear that he will stay well out of this one.

Leading the candidates is Germany's Thomas Bach, the IOC vice-president who seems to be the name on everyone's lips. Bach has been discreetly campaigning for several years now and offers a safe option as a respected lawyer from mainland Europe to maintain the IOC's statue as one of the biggest and most influential organisations in the world.

Remember, of the seven IOC Presidents, only one has been a non-European – the American Avery Brundage who was in charge from 1952 to 1972.

Thomas Bach with RoggeThomas Bach (right) is favourite to replace Jacques Rogge (left) as IOC President

Bach's most vocal potential rival so far is Ng Ser Miang of Singapore, another IOC vice-president with a strong powerbase in Asia.

He drew huge praise after heading the successful, inaugural Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games and has made little secret of his desire to stand, although like everyone else he has stopped short of actually declaring "I'm in".

Puerto Rico's Richard Carrion is another leading contender. A high profile banker by profession, he chairs the IOC's Finance Commission and Audit Commission which has allowed him to build strong support in the Movement.

CK Wu of Taiwan appears the dark horse after the AIBA President showed himself an election master in becoming the leader of world boxing in 2006 and then again in crushing Ireland's Pat McQuaid last year in an election to join the IOC Executive Board.

Among the outside contenders are René Fasel and Denis Oswald, both of Switzerland, and Morocco's Nawal El Moutawakel. Moutawakel has long been tipped to become the first female IOC President, but 2013 may be too early for such a radical move just yet.

While no one has officially declared their candidacy, British bookmakers Ladbrokes have made Bach the even-money favourite, with Carrion and Ng at 2-1 and 6-4, respectively.

But like the other races, all will be decided in Buenos Aires.

The Argentinian city is itself currently involved in a bid race for the 2018 Youth Olympics with Glasgow, Guadalajara, Medellin, and Rotterdam.

That race incidentally, will also be decided in 2013 in July.

But it is undoubtedly the 125th IOC Session in September that will shape the next decade of Olympic Movement.

It's going to be a fascinating few months. 

Tom Degun is a reporter for insidethegames. To follow him on Twitter click here.

Mike Rowbottom: When sport meets life and asks, "Is it right to play on?"

Emily Goddard
Mike Rowbottom50Covering the Olympics as part of the media, one operates in, effectively, a bubble. And the Games themselves are in a kind of bubble. But the bubble, inevitably, is compromised, impinged upon, by outside forces.

The Mexico 1968 Olympics were distorted by the shooting 10 days before the Games got underway of protestors against the Government who had gathered in the Tlatelolco area of the capital.

The Munich 1972 Olympics were brutally marked by the seizure and murder of Israeli athletes by the Black September group. That, inevitably, led to the classic quandary as far as the sporting activity was concerned - was it appropriate for the Games to go on, or not?

Among the many thousands of athletes caught in the middle of the Munich debacle was British sculler Ken Dwan, who vividly recalled the doubt and anxiety of that time in the Athletes Village, where the Israeli athletes were initially held in their apartment, as he spoke in the office of his shipping company on Eel Pie Island 40 years later.

The Munich 1972 Olympics were brutally marked by the seizure and murder of Israeli athletes by the Black September groupThe Munich 1972 Olympics were brutally marked by the seizure and murder of Israeli athletes by the Black September group

"We used to walk from our apartment through the square to get to the restaurant. And the first thing we knew was we got up one morning and there were lots of armed people around and they had barricaded some of the apartments off and we had to walk round to get some food. And then we all had television in our rooms so obviously we picked up what was going on with the Israeli team.

"We were all watching what was happening on TV. And the people holding the athletes were watching what was happening on TV. It was madness.

"And the whole atmosphere of the Games - it put it into question. What is this really about? We are here to do a sport, and we've got this happening next door. It did knock the stuffing out of you. It knocked a lot of motivation out of you. You started to question, well, 'Is this really worth it?' And once they had shot the athletes, it was debateable. Was it worth racing or not? I know the feeling I had was 'all I want to do is go home.' But you were out there...

"They held a memorial service in the Olympic Stadium and I felt I had to go. I felt it was madness that it should come to that situation. It was a very emotional thing to be involved with. It was strange. We were there for a reason, in an Olympic Stadium with a torch burning, and it was all laid out like a church. We were all sat on chairs on the grass of the infield. You looked round and it was weird.

"Quite a few of my British teammates were there. The Games had stopped. The discussion was: what do we do with it now? And the powers that be decided it would be better to carry on, although the athletes were given the option of going home.

"The right decision was made I think to carry on with the Games. We didn't want it to stop - but it knocked a hole in it. From the party happy atmosphere of what an Olympics is - to be hit like that was strange. Everyone appreciated that 'there but for the grace of God' sort of thing...it was sombre."

The Olympic flag flies at half mast at the 1972 Games in respect of the slain 11 Isreali athletesThe Olympic Flag flies at half mast at the Munich 1972 Games in respect of the slain 11 Isreali athletes

The Munich Olympics offered the starkest and most painful example of the problem sport has in determining its proper place in the broader scheme of things. Down the years, those involved in sport have always striven to keep it separate, in a world unto itself. But sport is always being impinged upon by other factors, other forces.

In the footballing world, a similar debate is currently underway as to what the best response should be to the incursion of racism. This week the footballers of AC Milan walked off the pitch during their friendly match against Italian lower division club Pro Patria because of persistent racist chanting from a small section of the crowd directed at their black players.

Ghana international Kevin-Prince Boateng set the walk-off in motion halfway through the first half when he picked up the ball and kicked it into the crowd before removing his shirt and leaving the field of play, followed by players and officials. There had already been appeals on the public address system for the chanting to stop.

In the meantime, the majority of the crowd made their feelings of anger clear at the minority which had wrecked their entertainment in an incident characterised by the Italian Football Federation's (FIGC) President, Giancarlo Abete, as "unspeakable and intolerable".

Kevin-Prince Boateng ac milan walk offKevin-Prince Boateng leads his fellow AC Milan players off the pitch during their friendly against Pro Patria because of persistent racist chanting

Milan's coach, Massimiliano Allegri, commented: "We promise to return, and we are sorry for the club and players of Pro Patria, but we could not make any other decision. We hope it will be an important signal."

However, Milan's illustrious former player Clarence Seedorf was more cautious in his reaction to the walk-off. "I don't feel it's such a fabulous thing," he told the BBC. "These people will feel empowered now. They should just be identified and kicked out of the stadium."

UEFA's President, Michel Platini, made his position clear last year before the 2012 European Championship when he said that any player who walked off the pitch because of racist abuse would be booked.

As Boateng and other black players have to listen to the bigotry cascading down from the stands, Dwan's question looms again: Is this worth it?

Boateng and his teammates made their choice this week. But if it happens again – where do they go? To the touchline once again? You like to think there has to be another way, both for their sake and for the sport which gives them their living.

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, the Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian.

David Owen: After a glorious 2012, it is time for Olympic chiefs to tune in to 2020 visions

Duncan Mackay
David OwenThe year 2012 was all about London, but now the Olympic Movement's focus is about to shift - to Istanbul, Madrid and Tokyo.

In less than a week's time, next Monday (January 7), this trio of combatants in the battle for the right to host the 2020 Olympics and Paralympics must submit Candidature Files giving an in-depth description of their respective projects to the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

Two months' later, in March, the IOC's Evaluation Commission, headed by Britain's Sir Craig Reedie, a former chairman of the British Olympic Association (BOA), will visit the three cities to inspect their plans.

Finally, on September 7, in the elegant Argentinian capital of Buenos Aires, location for the 125th IOC Session, the winner will be selected by IOC members.

What may sensibly be said about the race at eight months' distance from this all-important denouement?

Well, following the withdrawal of Rome and the IOC's decision not to admit Baku and Doha into the final phase of the contest, we have been left with the shortest Summer Games shortlist I have known since I began writing about the Movement more than a decade ago.

This has left the sense of excitement surrounding the race lagging well below the levels associated with the high-octane 2012 and 2016 contests.

In this respect, the present tussle has more in common with the 2008 race, decided in Moscow in 2001, when just about everyone was convinced - rightly - that Beijing would win.

Beijing awarded 2008 OlympicsIOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch announced at Moscow in 2001 that Beijing had been awarded the 2008 Olympics following a race where they had always been favourites

The paucity of survivors does not mean that the 2020 contest is a foregone conclusion, however.

When I consulted the odds in preparing this article, it was noticeable that every company I could see had Tokyo as warm, though not red-hot, favourite.

Odds on the Japanese capital ranged from 5-11 to 8-11, compared with a range of 7-4 to 3-1 for Istanbul, and of 3-1 to 19-2 for Madrid.

While I would not quibble, at this point, with Tokyo's status as favourite, however, I do think the present range of odds probably underestimates Istanbul's chance - particularly now that UEFA boss Michel Platini appears to have ended Turkey's hopes of staging more than the odd match of the Euro 2020 football tournament.

What do the three contenders need to do to maximise their prospects of crying tears of joy, rather than grief, in Argentina?

For Madrid, the priority must be to convince IOC members that the deep economic and fiscal problems dogging Spain would not interfere with the terrifically demanding business of preparing for the Games.

While some might be surprised that Madrid is the outsider, particularly given its experience of running in the last two races - finishing a close-up third behind London and a distant second to Rio de Janeiro - it is hard at the moment not to conclude that the 2020 contest has simply come at the wrong time for the Spanish capital.

This is a pity since Spain's sporting stock – as epitomised by Rafa Nadal, Fernando Alonso and its football teams - has never been higher.

The city, moreover, seems admirably equipped in many ways to host a successful Summer Games.

But if Spain's deep-seated economic problems are beyond the power of the current bid team to influence in any significant way, and if they have lost the formidable services of Juan Antonio Samaranch, the late former IOC President, there is nonetheless one critical thing decision-makers could do to improve the prospects of this, or more likely another future Madrid bid.

This is to provide a truly compelling articulation of why the IOC ought to take its flagship product back to Spain a mere 28 years after Madrid's arch-rival Barcelona hosted the Games - and put itself firmly on the international map in the process.

Constructing a compelling narrative should, by contrast, be the least of Istanbul's problems.

Istanbul scenic viewIstanbul's bid to host the 2020 Olympics and Paralympics is boosted by the city's stunning geographical location

A uniquely picturesque city in a stunning geographical location at the crossroads of two continents, it effortlessly ticks most of the boxes for a winning Olympic story-line.

Furthermore, there is less and less reason to doubt that Turkey's fast-developing economy could cope with the demands of hosting the Games, although a successful staging of a tournament of the scale and stature of the European football championship would have underlined its readiness.

Istanbul would be an adventurous choice, but the IOC has repeatedly shown itself willing to plump for the adventurous choice in recent times - and has yet to have its fingers burnt as a consequence.

Where I think the Turkish city will have to work hardest if it is to cruise up onto Tokyo's shoulder over the next eight months is in persuading the IOC of its capacity to execute some of the more mundane tasks that are indispensable to a successful Games.

Traffic management would be one area where I would require robust assurances; security would be another.

Tokyo, I think, has successfully established itself as the safe choice for the IOC in a volatile world.

If Istanbul fails to perform to its potential, that might yet be enough.

More likely, though, the Japanese bid will need to move up a couple of gears to avoid being overtaken.

That means persuading a majority of IOC members - who gave their last big prize, the 2018 Winter Games, to another Asian city, Pyeongchang - that Tokyo is not merely a safe choice, but an enticing one as well.

After a slow start, I have a hunch that this 2020 contest is destined soon to burst into life.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here 

Alan Hubbard: If Paralympians are looking for someone to blame in Honours row it should be David Cameron

Duncan Mackay
Alan Hubbard head and shouldersAs predicted, it's trebles all round as Sir Brad, Sir Ben, Dame Sarah and virtually the entire cast of 2012 celebrate their New Year Honours.

Then plethora of gongs dished out to Olympic and Paralympic winners  suggests that Lord Coe and his Sports Honours Committee employed a scattergun rather than the hatpin which seems to have been the selection procedure in other areas where the usual procession of civil service time-servers and political cap-doffers await the invitation to Buckingham Palace.

But not every is joining in with effusive messages of congratulations. Many seem to think than handing out awards by the bucketload to those who won gold is both unwarranted and unmerited.

KCB, CBE, OBE, MBE... is it all OTT? .

A radio phone-in on Saturday evening posed the question: Do Britain's Olympic and Paralympic champions deserve to be honoured in this way?

You may be surprised to know by ratio of 10-1 the answer was a resounding "No".

Now I am personally ambivalent about the Honours List - probably because I have never been on it - but there may well be some sympathy with the argument that Olympians - indeed all sportsmen and women - are only doing what they love and that the only medal they should care about is the one hanging around their neck; one that these days can be quickly converted into wads of hard cash from personal appearances, sponsorship and endorsements.

But some of the recipients themselves also seem less than delighted  with the system, not least a fistful of Paralympians, among them the dressage rider Lee Pearson (OBE) who told the Independent on Sunday that he was "pissed off" at the apparent discrepancy between disabled and able-bodied medal winners and that he was personally disappointed not to get a knighthood after winning his tenth gold in London .

He has a point. His gold medal tally is greater than the newly enobled Sir Wiggo's and Sir Ben Ainslie's put together.

Ben Ainslie on podium London 2012Sailor Ben Ainslie received a knighthood, even though he has less than half the number of gold medals that dressage rider Lee Pearson has won in the Paralympics

Six-times gold-medal wheelchair racing winner David Weir (CBE), one rung below a knighthood,  is also highly critical, suggesting Paralympians need to win more than their Olympic counterparts to get the similarly honoured.

That peerless Paralympian Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who sits on the Sports Honours Committee chaired by newly anointed Companion  of Honour Lord Coe, says she does not think you can compare the Olympics and Paralympics.

"Every gold medal Paralympian has bene honoured, which wasn't the same in previous years."

True. But if  if you want want to blame anyone for there not being a Sir David Weir or Sir Lee Pearson (or even a Dame Jessica Ennis) then perhaps it should be David Cameron - why as not the PM seems to get the blame for everything else?.

Apparently it was 10 Downing Street which imposed a quota,with an edict that there should be a cap on the number of sporting knighthoods and damehoods because it was felt the number of such awards being mooted was getting out of hand.

At every level of honour, more Olympians than Paralympians have been publicly rewarded in what supposedly as a year of sporting equality.

But the Honours List has never been a level playing field.

Especially, it is claimed, in Northern Ireland. There Irish eyes are definitely not smiling when they scan the record 127-strong list of those about to be gonged-up for their 2012 contributions.

There are Olympians from England, Scotland, and Wales...but not a single one from Northern Ireland.

This Irish angst is expressed forcibly by the Belfast Telegraph which points out  is not only gold which has earned gongs - silver medallist gymnast Louis Smith received an MBE. So they ask: "Why not our Coleraine oarsmen Richard and Peter Chambers who won silver in one of the most gruelling contests of the entire Olympics?

Team GB men four London 2012There is anger in Northern Ireland that rowers Peter and Richard Chambers (left and second right), who won silver medals at London 2012, have not been recognised in the Queen's New Years Honours List

"It would have made sense, if nothing else, to keep some parity with the awards to England, Scotland and Wales, in this sad saga of missed opportunities.

"The current New Year honours are particularly controversial in Northern Ireland because they do not award a single athlete here despite the outstanding achievements of several individuals in the London Olympics and Paralympics.

"The arguments for not doing so are unconvincing. Perhaps our Northern Ireland competitors were overlooked because we are the United Kingdom's second-class citizens and that people of influence in London and elsewhere could not care less about us.

"Even our Stormont Executive failed to arrange a proper home-coming celebration for all our Olympic and Paralympic athletes in the form of a street parade or reception where the public could show its support.

"Not so the Dublin Government, which was quick to honour its athletes - including some from Northern Ireland - in this way.

"Nevertheless, even if our local athletes deserve to have greater recognition from London and Stormont, their achievements will continue to be honoured by the ordinary people, where they matter most of all."

Fair point? As I say, fairness is clearly not the criteria.

If Kelly Holmes should get the ultimate accolade for her double gold triumph in Athens, why not Mo Farah? It's illogical.

And surely Gemma Gibbons, who emotionally won a nation's hearts as well as judo silver, would have been as worthy a recipient of an MBE as Louis Smith. But then she didn't win Strictly Come Dancing.

Louis Smith in Strictly Come DancingDid the fact gymnast Louis Smith win Strictly Come Dancing help him be awarded an MBE, while other Olympic medallists were overlooked?

There are other curious anomalies. Jackie Brock-Doyle, Lord Coe's media minder, gets an OBE for the admirably professional job she did as the London 2012 Director of Communications. Yet this is is one step down from the CBE awarded to her combative predecessor, Mike Lee, who fulfilled the same role in the run-up to London winning the bid.

And much as I applaud the MBE  given to Rob McCracken, Team GB's head boxing coach, is not Tony Minichiello, who has nurtured and mentored Ennis to her phenomenal heptathlon gold, equally worthy, along with a number of other unsung coaches?

There are MBE's for boxing's three gold medallists but I  am puzzled why, for example,  Anthony Joshua's victory in the super-heavyweight divison, on, let's face it, a slightly fortuitous home-town decision, is deemed worthier than the much lesser BEM belatedly handed out last year to boxing's oldest surviving world champion, 77-year-old Terry Downes, who has worked so tirelessly for charity.

The BEM (British Empire Medal) is the sort of bauble they usually dish out to long-serving town clerks. Maybe someone on the Honours Committee had a dyslexic moment when they noted it down.

There also has been some bleating - mainly from Scotland (though not from him) - that Andy Murray got a mere OBE and not a knighthood after winning Olympic gold and the US Open. Doubtless he will be upgraded to a K if and when he wins Wimbledon.

Fred Perry in actionFred Perry was never knighted despite being the last British man to win the Wimbledon title

But let's remember that the last Briton to do so, Fred Perry, three quarters of a century ago, has never been honoured in any way.

Now honours are flung about like confetti, but if they are judged the criteria of our acclaim then 2012 's fabulous sporting stars deserve to be at the head of the queue at  the Palace, lapels freshly pressed.

Even if it does seem all a bit gong-ho.

Alan Hubbard is an award-winning sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday, and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Olympics, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire

C K Wu: 2012 has been a phenomenal year for boxing

CK Wu blogAs 2012 is coming to an end and a new year is about to unfold, I would like to take this opportunity to put in a nutshell all the major activities and achievements of this extraordinary year.

It goes without saying that all members of the International Boxing Association (AIBA) Family played a key role in the success of AIBA's undertakings and therefore, I also would like to thank all members for their precious and continued contribution.

From January 18 to 22 in Bangkok, the AIBA Commission meetings were carried out. This was indeed a very productive gathering that had a significant impact on the development of our sport, especially in view of the Olympic Games and the launch of AIBA Professional Boxing (APB).

In February, I had the chance to attend the 5th International Olympic Committee (IOC) World Conference on Women and Sport; an important event where over 800 delegates from 135 countries approved "The Los Angeles Declaration", a series of recommendations aimed at promoting gender equality and equity in sport.
 
APB logoPlans were rubberstamped AIBA Professional Boxing at the start of the year

This event was followed in March by the signing of the "Brighton Declaration", a similar statement of principles about women and sport. With these steps, AIBA certainly puts itself on the front-line in defence of women's rights.

While these events were taking place, a new chapter of one of AIBA's most iconic programmes, 'Road to Dream', was coming to life in the city of Cardiff Wales with the "Road to London (I) Training Camp". 62 men and women boxers from 40 countries attended this training camp in preparation for the qualifying events of the London 2012 Olympic Games.

The "Road to London (II) Training Camp", attended by 44 athletes from 27 countries, took place in the same city just one month before the Olympic Games. The success of these two camps was such that in London, these athletes shone throughout the whole event, drawing extensive applause from both the public and the media.

Between April and May, as a prelude to the London 2012 Olympic Games, AIBA conducted five excellent continental qualifying events for men boxers. The competitions seen in Canberra, Astana, Trabzon, Casablanca and Rio de Janeiro gave us a first taste of how high the level of our boxers had become. The participation and heterogeneity of the National Federations and their respective athletes were absolutely unprecedented. Such remarkable achievement definitely sealed the success of these winning events.

In the beginning of May and June, two major events rocked the boxing ring of the ExCeL in the warm-up for the London 2012 Olympic Games: the World Series of Boxing (WSB) team final and individual championships, a thrilling epilogue of the second season of this boxing format that has now become the battlefield for franchises representing their countries. In this regard, I am very happy to welcome to the current season new teams in Algeria, Argentina, Great Britain, Poland and Ukraine.
 
WSB world champions 2012The World Series of Boxing finals for season two were held at the ExCeL shortly before the start of the London 2012 Olympic Games

Last May, 305 women boxers from 70 countries had the chance to showcase their skills and qualify for the London 2012 Olympic Games in what will be remembered as one of the most competitive AIBA Women's World Boxing Championships. In its seventh edition, this event has now become the only qualifying event to the Olympic Games available to women boxers.

Between May 26 and June 1, AIBA organised the Olympic referees and judges workshop in Assisi, in Italy, which was a very important event in preparation to the London 2012 Olympic Games.

In July, just before the Olympic Games, the AIBA Executive Committee gathered for its annual meeting during which important decisions were taken for the future of our sport. It was on this occasion that the AIBA EC awarded the 2013 AIBA Junior World Boxing Championships to Kyiv Ukraine, the 2014 AIBA Youth World Boxing Championships to Sofia and the 2014 AIBA Women's World Boxing Championships to Canada.

The roaring success of the long-awaited London 2012 Olympic Games finally paid off all our efforts in preparation to this important event. Many goals were achieved, some even beyond expectations. Above all, a special mention goes to the triumph of women's boxing. These women, who for the first time participated in an Olympiad, performed with such spirit that words fail to describe the atmosphere they created.
 
Nicola AdamsLondon 2012 Owas hugely successful, particularly the new women’s boxing competition that saw Britain’s Nicola Adams claim the first ever gold medal

At the turn of October and November, AIBA organised in Incheon, the WSB/APB referees and judges and supervisor workshop with the aim of forming a new group of referees, judges and supervisors with a specific preparation in view of APB.

Not too long after the dimming of the lights of London, WSB marked in November the return of great boxing with a new season full of excitements.

Last but not least, the success of the 2012 AIBA World Youth Boxing Championships held this November-December in Yerevan. This event, which concluded our boxing calendar for this year, was a magnificent occasion to admire many rising stars and gives us hope for an even brighter tomorrow of our beloved sport.

Now, as this year is winding down, we can look at the future with the confidence that there is no such thing like an impossible objective. Our achievements speak for themselves.

For this reason, I would like to encourage all members of the AIBA Family to continue on this path in view of next year's challenges, among which the most important are: the AIBA Junior World Boxing Championships in Kyiv in August, the AIBA World Boxing Championships in Almaty in October, the AIBA Women's Junior/Youth World Boxing Championships, the opening of the Boxing Academy in Kazakhstan and finally the launch of the APB.

C K Wu is the AIBA President and an International Olympic Committee (IOC) Executive Board member

Tom Degun: Big 2013 ahead for AIBA and boxing


Tom Degun ITG2Pretty much all 26 sports involved at the London 2012 Olympics came out in better shape than they went in, and not only in PR terms.

The Association of Summer Olympic International Federations (ASOIF) director Andrew Ryan, the man primarily responsible for distributing the profits to the 26 sports federations involved in London 2012, recently informed me that they will soon all be sharing a pot of over $450 million (£280 million/€345 million).

In fact, when the money if fully counted next year, the figure could even approach as much as $475 million (£296 million/€365 million), which marks a dramatic increase on the $296 million (£184 million/€227 million) they received from Beijing 2008.

But taking everything into account, there were few bigger winners at London 2012 than boxing.

From July 28 to August 12, the sport drew sold out crowds to ExCeL for virtually every session. As is required for all great tournaments, the hosts, Great Britain, topped the medal standings with five medals, three of which were gold.

But it was the successful Olympic debut of women's boxing that really helped the sport steal the show.

It was that girl from Leeds with the radiant smile - Nicola Adams - who fittingly won the first ever Olympic gold medal in women's boxing as she defeated old nemesis, China's Ren Cancan, in a high class bout.
 
Nicola AdamsNicola Adams became the first Olympic female boxing gold medallist in history at London 2012

Her win was quickly followed by gold for Ireland's female boxing star Katie Taylor, who cemented celebrity status with a win over Russia's Sofya Ochigava at lightweight. America's Claressa Shields claimed the third and final women's Olympic boxing gold medal on offer at London 2012 with victory over Russia's Nadezda Torlopova to round off a truly memorable Olympic female boxing debut.

The atmosphere in ExCeL during women's gold medal bouts was truly electric, particularly during Taylor's match when half of Ireland had seeming managed to secure a ticket.

But as that historic session took place, one man was smiling more than any other in the crowd.

It was International Boxing Association (AIBA) President CK Wu.

It was Wu, in 2009, who spearheaded the movement to get women's boxing included on the Olympic programme despite tough opposition, even from within AIBA.

"It was a very proud moment for me to see women's boxing at the Olympics," Wu told me shortly after the Games with genuine warmth in his voice.

"They surprised everyone with their talent and the spectators were fully behind them which was one of the most pleasing things for me, even though that it what I predicted would happen."

CK Wu 2AIBA President CK Wu spearheaded the movement to get women’s boxing onto the Olympic programme

The London 2012 boxing competition came just days after Wu secured a spot on the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) Executive Board – making a very good summer for him.

It was six years ago, in 2006, that the 66-year-old Taiwanese architect ousted Anwar Chowdhry of Pakistan to become AIBA President.

Under Chowdhry, corruption was rife across AIBA to the point where the sport's Olympic future looked in doubt. Wu's coup saw him narrowly oust the Pakistani, who had been in the role for 20 years, by 83 votes to 79.

Wu spent the majority of his first term "cleaning the house" as he often calls it; getting rid of the majority of Chowdhry's lieutenants and creating more of a transparent AIBA.

Anward ChowdhryC K Wu ousted Anwar Chowdhry of Pakistan in 2006 to become AIBA President

He was re-elected in 2010, comfortably seeing off a disastrous challenge from England's Paul King, and now he has probably the best ever Olympic boxing competition under his belt.

Next in Wu's masterplan is to go toe-to-toe with the world of professional boxing.

This was outlined in 2010 when AIBA launched the World Series of Boxing (WSB) – the first professional boxing competition in the world that allows fighters to retain their Olympic eligibility.

That competition was given a major boost this year when Britain, officially the world's best Olympic boxing nation following London 2012, announced their intention to compete.

Given the title of the British Lionhearts, it has London 2012 Olympic silver medallists Fred Evans of Wales and John Joe Nevin of Ireland in its ranks and is currently making good progress. Rumours continue to circulate that Britain's reigning Olympic super heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua, currently one of the hottest properties in boxing, is close to joining in what would be a major coup.

anthony joshuaBritain’s reigning Olympic super heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua is rumoured to be close to joining the WSB

But Joshua or no Joshua, the WSB is just the tip of the iceberg.

The latter part of 2013 will see the launch of AIBA Pro Boxing (APB) which will see boxers again fight professionally but retain their Olympic eligibility in a tournament that will link to the WSB.

What makes it a must for most nations is that the APB will offer 56 quota places for the Rio 2016 Olympics, with the WSB to offer a further 10 slots for the Games in Brazil.

By those next Olympics, AIBA will have removed headguards and vests from their competitions while the computer scoring system will be replaced by judges – meaning that it won't look "amateur" at all.

Indeed, that word "amateur" is set to become obsolete.

In a recent letter to all National Federations, Wu call on every single one to drop the term "amateur" in a move that signals the end of 132 years of history.

"In 2007, at the AIBA Extraordinary Congress held in Chicago, AIBA had already declared not to use the word of 'amateur' in the organisation any longer," says Wu's letter.

"Now, even further with the launch of APB, the concept of 'amateur boxing' will no longer exist. What was previously known as amateur boxing will, from now on, be known as 'AIBA Olympic Boxing' (AOB)."

The revolutionary move will affect the vast majority of National Federations, including the original governing body, the Amateur Boxing Association of England (ABAE), who will now have to drop "Amateur" from their title, despite having been founded as the Amateur Boxing Association in 1880.

AIBAAIBA are changing the face of boxing through their professional programmes World Series of Boxing and AIBA Pro Boxing

From the outside things look to be moving a little fast, but there does appear to be real method.

I remember telling Wu, following an APB launch press conference, that he is likely to have death threats from the top professional promoters if he indeed manages to cut off their Olympic talent pool.

It was partly a joke.

But after explaining quite calmly that was unfazed, having actually received numerous death threats from Chowdhry supporters, he appeared to outline his reasoning.

"The professional promoters have sat back and taken the best Olympic talent for far too long, often not looking after that talent if things go wrong," he told me. "It is time that we fight back, and that we offer fighters a different, safer option after an Olympics."

It is a fair point.

I can't imagine that the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) would have been too happy to lose Usain Bolt after he emerged as a global superstar at Beijing 2008, nor the International Swimming Federation (FINA) if they had Michael Phelps stolen after making a real name for himself at the same Games.

So 2013 will prove a big year for AIBA and boxing. And to be fair, boxing wouldn't be boxing without fighting both inside and outside the ropes.

Tom Degun is a reporter for insidethegames

Mike Rowbottom: Seb Coe – the wariness of the cross-country runner…

Duncan Mackay
Mike Rowbottom head and shouldersA binliner of ripped wrapping teeters outside our front door. The lit tree which looked so radiant of promise now has a mournful edge to it. The fridge is full of brandy cream and going-over vegetables. All the signs that Christmas has been and gone. As has a Christmas read - Seb Coe's autobiography, Running My Life (Hodder and Stoughton, £20 – but only £9 from the insidethegames shop).

It would be facile to observe that, had the youthful Coe not turned around the most shattering defeat of his life, when arch-rival Steve Ovett beat him to the Olympic 800 metres gold at the 1980 Moscow Games, his book might have been titled Ruining My Life. Ah well. Observation made.

But of course he did turn it round, iconically, with victory in the 1,500m – the event Ovett was expected to win – and he has made a habit of producing triumphs ever since.

Even when, as Conservative MP for Falmouth and Cambourne, he dropped out of Government during the rout that was the 1997 General Election, Coe points out with grim pride that the swing against him was only five per cent, against an average across the country of 11 per cent - the smallest that night against any incumbent Conservative MP.

I know the subject of this book not well, but a bit better than many who will read it in the wake of the outstandingly successful London 2012 Games, to which Baron Coe of - appropriately enough - Ranmore was essential both in terms of bidding and execution. To me, having written about Coe as an athlete briefly and a sports politician at greater length, some of the story, and indeed some of the phrasing, is familiar.

And it's a curious thing, but having read the book I feel I know more things about Coe, but don't get a feeling of really knowing him.

Even despite its open moments – the description of how he told the organiser of the Stockholm meeting to "fuck off" after suspiciously bungled pacing had possibly deprived him of another world record, the family details revealing his grandmother Violet as a "true cockney" and his great-grandfather Harry Newbold as a professional gambler, his inexplicable failure to pass his 11-Plus exam, the confession of an extra-marital affair which got all over the papers and, painfully, temporarily damaged his relationship with his then 12-year-old daughter - even despite all this, there is a curiously closed feeling to the book.

Running my Life by Sebastian CoeRunning my Life reveals details of Sebastian Coe's life but left Mike Rowbottom wanting to know more

The text is as carefully modulated as the speeches we have come to expect of Coe in recent years as he has tip-toed around the often grotesque sensibilities of those who govern the world of sports politics - a world in which he himself is becoming an increasingly influential figure.

Decca Aitkenhead of The Guardian also observed this tendency in the book, forming the conclusion, following a subsequent interview, that Coe was "a crashing bore." Not fair. Not true. But for sure, Coe is guarded. He is a politician to his bones.

You question whether Aitkenhead, and other detractors, understand where Coe is coming from - or, more to the point, where he is heading to. He may have delivered on London 2012, but, to borrow from Robert Frost, he has promises to keep, and miles to go before he sleeps. His life is still a political work in progress.

Watching Coe walk through the ranks of his peers to accept the Lifetime Achievement Award at this year's BBC Sports Personality of the Year award was rather disturbing, if only because this master of self-control looked seriously in danger of choking up.

Sebastian Coe receives BBC Award from Duchess of CambridgeThe Duchess of Cambridge presents Sebastian Coe with the Lifetime Achievement Award during the BBC Sports Personality of the Year Awards 2012

The reference to his absent parents - his mother died in 2005, his father three years after that - was brief but heartrending. A glimpse into the interior, brief as the one afforded in the aftermath of that Moscow 1500m victory, where his face and body were transfixed with blazing emotion.

Thinking about it, I feel the most revealing passage of Coe's latest – but surely not his last – autobiography is the one where he describes his feelings about his early runs as a member of Hallamshire Harriers over the fells of Yorkshire and neighbouring Derbyshire:

"I loved everything about it - the physical sensation, the act of putting one foot in front of the other and covering the ground effortlessly and reasonably quickly, and also, if I'm honest, winning the approval of the older and more seasoned athletes...

"Cross-country running was literally the making of me...you are using every part of your body. It's hard and it's tough. You've got to maintain balance, you've got to be able to navigate and think ahead, you've got to watch your feet. You may be running on a track that's the width of a table, or across terrain that is little more than peat bog, making split-second decisions every step of the way. Your brain never switches off."

It stands as the perfect metaphor for Coe's progress through life. And the man is still picking his route ahead with the utmost care...

To order a copy of Running My Life by Sebastian Coe from the insidethegames shop click here

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, the Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian.

Alan Hubbard: UK Sport's uncompromising approach to Lottery funding contravenes spirit of sport

Duncan Mackay
Alan Hubbard head and shouldersHope you all had a Happy Christmas. I know several sports folk who didn't. Thanks to the Scrooges at UK Sport.

Christmas spirit seemed to be in somewhat short supply in London's Bloomsbury, where the Government-backed distributer of Lottery and Exchequer funding is based.

A few days before the festive season began loadsa-money was lobbed from Russell Square in the direction of Olympic and Paralympic sport, some £347 million ($563 million/€427 million) of it, though most escaped the desperate clutches of the poor and needy in an act some might describe as Dickensian, others positively Thatcherite.

Among those pursuits denied a slice of the expansive handout towards Rio 2016 were handball, indoor and sitting volleyball, basketball and table tennis.

British Volleyball chairman Richard Callicott admits he spent Christmas  holding the wrong end of the turkey wishbone. "The phenomenally hard work and commitment of our athletes and coaches has been rewarded with the utter obliteration of our sport at elite level," he declares angrily.

Team GB volleyball v Russia London 2012Britain's women's volleyball team take on Russia at London 2012

He goes on: "We could not be more disappointed. We have stars, and world-class athletes like Dami Bakare now playing in one of the most competitive leagues in the world in Korea, but the opportunity for him and his outstanding teammates no longer exists for them to play for their country.

"There are over thirty players playing professionally for clubs throughout Europe and North America as well as Dami. We have produced British athletes from our own programmes across all six of our disciplines.

"It seems frankly unfair after our brilliant endeavours at London 2012 when we were required to produce credible performances, where the GB indoor women's team rose 49 places in the world rankings, winning a match against a much higher ranked team, and sitting volleyball created so many new enthusiasts at the Paralympics, that both sports should be rewarded with precisely nothing for their efforts over those past five years.

" I am simply shocked that our sporting leaders could be so dismissive of such a mighty effort."

Here here...

Richard CallicottRichard Callicott claims that the British Volleyball elite programme has suffered "utter obliteration" thanks to UK Sport's decision to cut its National Lottery funding

Now here's the irony. Callicott, as a former UK Sport chief executive himself, was originally responsible for distributing Lottery funding to sport when it was initiated by then Prime Minister John Major. His was a more sympathetic approach than the invidious "no compromise" philosophy augmented by the present incumbent, Liz Nicholl,  which leaves her predecessor's sport,  virtually without hope of getting to Rio despite their valued presence at London 2012 to boost ticket sales.

Callicott tells insidethegames: "It's heartless. Liz Nicholl says sports with limited or no funding can go back annually for the situation to be reviewed if they have made progress. That's like telling a Formula One team on the starting grid that they no longer have access to fuel but if they can catch up with the rest they can re-join the race. What do they do? Push the bloody car?"

Another irony is that three days after being honoured by the BBC with the prestigious Helen Rollason award for outstanding achievement in the face of adversity Martine Wright, who lost both legs in then 7/7 terrorist bombings, learned that sitting volleyball, which helped rebuild her shattered life, has, like the able-bodied indoor game, lost all funding.

Martine Wright at London 2012Martine Wright, a survivor of the 7/7 terrorist attacks, fears that the cut in Lottery funding will affect programmes which help rehabilitate injured servicemen and women

She says she feels particularly gutted because it will undermine the sport's role in rehabilitating injured servicemen and women.

"As a new team in just two and a half years we performed to our expectations in London and were looking forward to continuing to make progess. It's disappointing but we are determined for the programme to carry on."

I have never been a fan of UK Sport's uncompromising diktat which surely helps promote the sort of win-at-all-costs mentality that contravenes the spirit of sport, rewarding the already-haves rather than the have-nots.

"It is a philosophy which simply mean that unless you medal you don't get the money," argues Callicott.

Now I happen to like Liz Nicholl. For one thing she  has sprung from the grassroots of sport as a former netball player who became that sport's inspirational chief executive.

She is pleasant and extremely able example of British sport's growing Girl Power as is her formidable chair, Baronesss Sue Campbell.

But I strongly contend that between them they have got this one grossly wrong, as has the supportive Sports Minister, Hugh Robertson, with whom I do not often disagree.

He insists that if you give money to those sports that won't win a medal, you will have to take it away from athletes that might.

"Denying athletes in a sport like cycling the chance of winning a gold medal is not fair or right," he says.

The phrase Catch 22 comes to mind, while Baron Pierre de Coubertin would be turning in his proverbial grave.

Cycling isn't short of cash, nor are many of its stars (Sir Chris Hoy, Bradley Wiggins, Victoria Pendleton and Lizzie Armistead to name but a few).

They are big earners who, I doubt no longer have the need for Lottery funding, like others who have become both rich and even more famous on the back  of the 2012 Olympics through endorsements and other and luctrative commercial deals.

Jess Ennis, Mo Farah and Ellie Simmonds are also prime examples as are those GB boxers who now are virtually full-time pros earning up to six figures for taking part in the World Series Boxing tournament.

Good luck tio them all.

Assuming they no longer receive for Lottery funding (it would be a scandal if they did) could not the money they otherwise would have been given be diverted to sport's lesser mortals who might then have the resources they need to progress towards the Rio rostrum?

Roger Draper beside tennis courtLTA chief executive Roger Draper has been called "useless" but still earned a £200,000 bonus on top of his £440,000 salary

Here's a thought: Nothing to do with UK Sport of course, but an  astonishing £200,000 ($322,000/€243,00)) bonus, on  top of his £440,0000 ($708,000/€535,000) salary has been paid to the Lawn Tennis Association's Roger "The Dodger" Draper who heads a body deemed "useless" by Baroness Billingham, chair of the All Parliamentary Tennis Group.

That would more than cover the British Volleyball hiring a top class coach and an assistant after having to let go the one they had because they could no longer afford to pay him.

It is true that Sport England can provide some funding for sports at grassroots level, but cash-strapped youngsters who want to fulfil their potential need world-class coaching and sports science back-up which only UK Sports elite funding programme can provide.

There are some good people at UK Sport but I am not alone in questioning the fairness or morality of their distribution of Lottery and taxpayers' money.

"Lust for gold has blinded UK Sport to the needs of the poor," reads the headline in The Times above over a piece by former British Olympic table tennis player Matthew Syed.

Matthew Syed playing table tennisUK Sport "has lost the plot" according to former British table tennis player Matthew Syed

He says UK Sport "has lost the plot", that socially inclusive inner-city sports like volleyball,  handball, basketball and table tennis have been cynically "shafted'' by an organisation that has lavished public money on posh public school-practiced sports such as equestrianism, rowing and sailing.

"The implications are, in their way, deeply regressive. Money from taxpayers and lottery players is being siphoned into training opportunities for athletes from often wealthy backgrounds. Meanwhile, high-potential children from poorer families, who could never afford elite coaching without public support, are left on the scrapheap. This is social engineering in reverse. It is the very opposite of meritocracy. And it should be confronted."

Strong words from a one-time Labour parliamentary candidate.

It is certainly true that these elite sport have done better than most because of their success yet they are ones in which it is far easier to win medals because  fewer nations participate.

Question: Why should UK Sport be the sole arbiter of who gets what and why?

Would it not be fairer to have an independent panel making the final assessment on UK Sport's recommendations?

British Volleyball, for one, say they will be  appealing - and that surely should be heard by an independent panel.

Meantime I doubt their Christmas card, depicting Tiny Tim beseeching Scrooge "But sir, zero won't be enough to fund a competitive volleyball  programme" rests prominently on Liz Nicholl's mantelpiece.

Alan Hubbard is an award-winning sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday, and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Olympics, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire

David Owen: Team GB's Rio 2016 preparation base has an unwelcome place in the annals of English sporting history

David Owen ITGSo the British Olympic Association (BOA) has picked a location in Belo Horizonte to serve as preparation camp for its athletes prior to and during the next Summer Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro in four years' time.

I don't doubt that the Minas Tenis Clube, complete with its indoor sports halls and "Lagoa dos Ingleses" (Englishmen's Lake) will provide a splendid base for the British team as they recuperate from their eleven-hour flight and acclimatise to the four-hour time difference.

However, this 5.5 million-strong city has an unwelcome place in British, or at least English, sporting history, as the setting for one of its most ignominious defeats.

Go back 62 years to 1950, two years after the second London Olympics, the so-called "Austerity Games".

An England football team including giants of the game such as Alf Ramsey, Tom Finney and Stan Mortensen is in Brazil for the World Cup.

So strong is the team that it is widely seen as joint favourite to lift the famous gold Jules Rimet trophy, along with hosts Brazil.

The first game against Chile is won, comfortably enough, 2-0 in the Maracana Stadium.

England vs United States of America 1950 World CupEngland lost to the United States 1-0 in the first round of the1950 World Cup

Next up: a trip to Belo Horizonte for a match against a little-regarded United States of America team.

Victory should be a formality before the group decider, back in Rio, versus Spain.

That at least was the theory; in fact the US won 1-0 thanks to a first-half goal from Joe Gaetjens, their Haitian-born forward.

"Probably never before has an England team played so badly," lamented The Times, adding: "The small ground and the close marking of the United States defenders seemed to upset the English players in their close passing game".

I recently came across an interesting account of the disastrous World Cup campaign in an autobiography written by Charles Buchan, a former England international turned journalist.

The book was first published in 1955, but a new edition has recently appeared.*

According to this account, prior to the fateful match, the England team stayed at a "little mountain village" called Morro Velho, where they were guests of a "British gold-mining company".

England vs United States of America captains 1950 World CupThe captains of England and the US, Billy Wright and Ed McIlvenny (right) exchange souvenirs at the start of their match

"It was a British colony, a home from home, with British food and a whiff of home atmosphere," Buchan recounts.

He describes Belo Horizonte as a "flourishing new city...reached from Morro Velho along a road twisting breathtakingly around the side of a mountain with a sheer drop on one side.

"It was clouded with a red dust that, even with the windows clamped shut, filled the cars."

The pressmen present subsequently had to file their reports of the debacle via one of two telephone-lines.

Writes Buchan: "By the time the last message was through, the pitch was in darkness.

"When no one could find an electric torch there was the strange spectacle of half a dozen reporters grouped around the phone on an otherwise deserted ground, frantically making bonfires of newspapers so that the copy could be read to the cable office in Rio and thence transmitted to faraway Fleet Street."

The ex-pro rated the Americans "on a par with one of our Third Division teams, like Rochdale.

"Yet by sheer guts and enthusiasm they humbled mighty England."

Team GB Rio 2016 training camp Minas Tênis Clube Belo HorizonteTeam GB athletes will use Belo Horizonte in the South East of Brazil as a preparation camp prior to and during Rio 2016

No doubt British athletes - and journalists - will find conditions utterly transformed when they visit Belo Horizonte in 2016, assuming indeed, in the journalists' case, that they haven't already passed through during the second Brazilian World Cup in 2014.

But that first-ever English World Cup defeat remains hard to stomach.

Let's hope Britain's 2016 Olympians can give the country's sports fans some happier sporting memories to associate the fine city of Belo Horizonte with.

* A Lifetime in Football by Charles Buchan, published by Mainstream Publishing, 7 Albany Street, Edinburgh. Price £9.99.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here

Andy Hunt: 2012 was our greatest year but better never stops as we are already planning ahead

Andy Hunt BOAUnforgettable. Incomparable. Unbeatable? The year 2012 will forever be remembered as one of the greatest in British sporting history.

During the magical summer of 2012 we witnessed the unique power of sport to unite and inspire our nation. Team GB felt a wave of support from every corner of the United Kingdom. People of all ages, beliefs and backgrounds rallied behind our athletes and lifted them to unprecedented heights of success.

Within each of us, we rediscovered the spirit of camaraderie, friendship and understanding that is at the heart of the Olympic Games. It was a year in which Britain was truly "Great", and London was the centre of attention once again.

On the field of play, Our Greatest Team – Team GB and ParalympicsGB – delivered an incredible 185 medals to light up the London 2012 Games and inspire generations to come.

Mo Farah celebrating with Team GB flagMo Farah was among the stars of London 2012 by becoming the first Briton to win the Olympic 5,000 and 10,000 metres titles

When it mattered most, on the greatest stage of all, our athletes stepped up and delivered. And they did so in front of the most passionate, knowledgeable and enthusiastic sports fans in the world.

For Team GB and ParalympicsGB to have the honour of receiving the prestigious BBC Sports Personality 'Team of the Year' award last Sunday was a very fitting tribute to everyone involved.

First and foremost to the 541 athletes from 26 diverse sports, who have relentlessly dedicated and sacrificed so much in pursuit of their goal of competing for Team GB at the Olympic Games.

Secondly to the coaches, training partners, medical personnel and other support staff who devote themselves day-in day-out to giving our athletes the very best chance of achieving their personal best.

Ellie Simmonds London 2012It was a momentous Games for teenager Ellie Simmonds who won two gold medals during the London 2012 Paralympics

Finally, to our valued and trusted partners at the National Governing Bodies, UK Sport, Government and our Corporate Sponsors, who all worked together in a spirit of collaboration to reach a shared goal of making certain the athletes of Team GB had the very best opportunity for success at London 2012.

On a personal note, 2012 has certainly been the most exciting, challenging and ultimately fulfilling of my life in leading Team GB at a Home Games. There are simply too many highlights and too many firsts to mention, but this is a year that I know I will look back on with real pride, as I simply don't think we could have done anything more at the British Olympic Association (BOA) to provide a better platform for Team GB athletes at the London 2012 Games.

In keeping with the BOA motto of "Better Never Stops", we are already moving ahead full steam with our planning and preparation for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, and of course the Sochi 2014 Olympic Winter Games, which are now just 14 months away.

And as part of our strategy to support the development of future Olympic stars, we are taking a team of 120 young athletes from 11 sports to compete at the Australian Youth Olympic Festival in January, the first of seven Youth Olympic events at which Team GB will be represented during the next four years.

Laura Trott of Great Britain and British Cycling director Dave BrailsfordLaura Trott celebrates with British Cycling director Dave Brailsford after winning Olympic gold in the women's omnium, her second of the Games

We are delighted that the overall level of funding for British Olympic sport is increasing. This represents a tremendous vote of confidence in the British sport system, its coaches and high performance personnel and, most importantly, the athletes who continue to deliver on the national and international stage.

Rio 2016 is four years away and the hard work now begins in earnest to maintain the momentum that was established by Team GB at the London 2012 and Beijing 2008 Games.

However, some sports over the last week have received the disappointing news that their UK Sport funding has ceased and no doubt, they recognise this will make the process of qualifying for Rio 2016 all-the-more challenging. We hope these sports recognise that they delivered credible, competitive performances at the London 2012 Games and did so in a manner that made our country proud.

Of course, we all owe a debt of gratitude to The National Lottery and lottery players throughout the United Kingdom – whose support is so critical to the success of British athletes and Team GB.

From the BOA and Team GB, to everyone who made 2012 a year none of us will ever forget, we offer our heartfelt congratulations and thanks. It was a truly remarkable year for British sport.

Andy Hunt is the chief executive of the British Olympic Association (BOA)

Tom Degun: Good times ahead for the USOC

Tom Degun ITG2One of the hot topics in the Olympic Movement right now is what Olympic and Paralympic Games the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) will bid for.

A bid is now imminent; the only question is whether America will bid for the 2024 Summer Games or 2026 Winter Games. The smart money would be on 2024 for the obvious reason that the Summer Olympics and Paralympics are far more prominent and lucrative than their Winter counterpart.

But even so, the USOC will give nothing away, and nor do they have to until the bidding begins in 2015.

Yesterday the USOC Board of Directors met at the Electronic Arts headquarters in Redwood City, California. As has now become customary such Board meeting, USOC chairman Larry Probst and chief executive Scott Blackmun held a teleconference for the media afterwards.

Like all the previous USOC teleconferences I have dialled in for this year, Probst and Blackmun were most cordial but quickly made it clear that both 2024 and 2026 were both still very much on the table.
 
Blackmun and ProbstUSOC chairman Larry Probst (right) and chief executive Scott Blackmun (left) have not yet decided if America will bid for the Olympics and Paralympics in 2024 or 2026

Other than the unanimous re-election of Probst, which should help speed up his International Olympic Committee (IOC) membership, the headline news was that the USOC will start meeting with cities across America next year that are interested in hosting either Games.

"Our message is that we want to talk to anybody that wants to talk to us about a bid and we will provide more details on that process early next year," explained Blackmun, in a move that is certain to spark a flurry of activity across the United States.

"Even with a 2024 bid, we still have until 2015 until we need to make a firm decide so we definitely have time on our side. I don't think we will have made any final decision on a bid, even by next year, but we want to be more informed and smarter by the end of 2013 than we are at the beginning."

The fact of the matter is that so many cities America are capable of hosting a great Games. New York City, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles and Philadelphia are just some of the cities likely to put their name forward for 2024 with Denver, Reno-Tahoe and Salt Lake City set to do the same for 2026.

Once a city is chosen, regardless of who stands in their way internationally, the United States look very difficult to beat. This is largely due to the fact that the USOC, mainly thanks to the impressive efforts of Blackmun, managed to settle their high profile revenue-sharing dispute with the IOC following years of negotiations.

That announcement was made at the 2012 Sport Accord Convention in Québec City in May. I remember well a smiling Probst at that press conference in Canada saying that the deal had "removed a roadblock from a successful bid from the United States."

IOC President Jacques Rogge, who sat next to Probst in that press conference, looked equally pleased.
 
Probst with RoggeUSOC chairman Larry Probst (left) and IOC President Jacques Rogge (right) are on excellent terms after the two organisations settled their revenue-sharing dispute this year

"This is a very happy moment for the IOC and the USOC," said Rogge. "The USOC is an absolutely crucial pillar in the Olympic Movement. This agreement lays a cornerstone which will provide the foundations for the continued growth of the Movement and our shared values, not just in the United States but around the world."

To illustrate how problematic the dispute was; it saw New York City's bid for 2012 Games eliminated in the second round of IOC voting and then Chicago's bid for the 2016 Olympics and Paralympics humiliated in the first round.

I remember well the visit I made to Chicago during their 2016 bid and being very impressed by plans. In terms of technical quality, it was absolutely superb and only politics saw it meet such a sad end.

Chicago will surely not suffer the same fate if returns to bid for 2024.
 
Chicago 2016Chicago are likely to attempt to bid for the 2024 Olympics and Paralympics having missed out in 2016

Another factor that makes it so strong is that the vast majority of money for the Olympics comes from the United States. American television network giant NBC are the big financial backer of the Games with McDonalds, Coca-Cola and indeed the majority of IOC Top Partners hailing from US shores.

People will say that the Games must to go to new parts. Indeed it must, and it will. But at the same time, the IOC will be careful to recognise the "crucial pillar" of the Olympic Movement that is the USOC. They can't afford to do otherwise.

So come 2024 or 2026, you would do well not to look much further than America and now -in a break with recent years - good times now lie ahead for the USOC.

Tom Degun is a reporter for insidethegames

Mihir Bose: Winter whisperers must not knock Qataris from their core 2022 message

Emily Goddard
mihirSo what has Qatar in common with South Africa? On the face of it you would think this is an absurd, Christmas quiz, question. But it is not.

In footballing terms they have a lot in common. The common factor is both countries are pioneers for the world's most popular game, staging the FIFA World Cup in their part of the world for the first time. And both countries have had the need to convince the world they are worthy of having this honour.

However, there is one crucial difference. When South Africa started on its quest to bring the World Cup to Africa for the first time the whole world, apart from rivals such as Germany, England, Morocco, Libya, wanted them to stage the competition. And there were many in Germany and England, not connected with the bids, who felt South Africa should have got the 2006 World Cup. That you may recall went to Germany, almost by default.

South Africa had what may be called the huge plus-Mandela factor in its support. The world feeling guilty for the way it had tolerated, even acquiesced, in apartheid for decades was keen to make up to Mandela's rainbow nation. Qatar, in contrast, were not only surprise winners but have struggled with what may be called a huge minus factor of both being an Arab country and an oil-rich one. Questions about how Qatar won the World Cup, despite all the protestations by the Qataris that they won it fair and square, continue to be raised. This makes its task of being a host that the world will welcome all the harder.

sepp blatter qatar 2022Questions about how Qatar won the World Cup, despite all the protestations by the Qataris that they won it fair and square, continue to be raised

All this was vividly brought home to me when I visited Qatar last week for the Doha Goals programme. Nothing could have better illustrated how keen this desert country is to impress the world that it takes not just football but sport seriously. So we had almost everyone that matters in world sport starting with Sepp Blatter through to Seb Coe and any number of Olympic and other great sporting winners such as Francois Pienaar and Carl Lewis.

A desert may not be the place to see swimmers but there was Ian Thorpe, the Australian hero of the Sydney Games seeing this as a stepping stone for his personal quest to carry on until the Rio Olympics. And one of the images in the main conference hall was that iconic one of Mandela handing the 1995 Rugby World Cup to Pienaar, an image that truly tells a thousand stories of nation building through sport.

South African president Nelson Mandela dressed in a No 6 Springbok jersey congratulates the Springbok captain Francois Pienaar after South Africa beat the All Blacks by 15-12 to win the 1995 Rugby World CupSouth African President Nelson Mandela (L), dressed in a number six Springbok jersey, congratulates the Springbok captain Francois Pienaar after South Africa beat the All Blacks by 15-12 to win the 1995 Rugby World Cup

It was quite an experience sitting in the Aspire Dome watching the start of the Doha Goals forum. The Dome itself must be one of the most unique buildings of its type. This is no ordinary conference venue. This is an indoor sports complex complete with a full size football pitch, Olympic-sized swimming pool, diving pool and an indoor athletics track. At one stage during the conference trying to find the auditorium where a press conference was being held I saw a sign for the track. Just in front of me was Jonathan Edwards and for a moment I thought he was about to perform when I realised he was one of the many glittering stars from sport who formed part of the Doha Goals programme.

And the main hall where the opening ceremony, and many other events took place, was like no other conference hall I have ever been to. For a start the seating showed a fascinating class distinction. Facing the podium were comfortable sofa style seats, followed by the more common seats you find in conference halls and then at the back the sort of tiered seats in an indoor sports area. Not knowing where to sit I headed for them only to be told this was for the more than 250 students from all over the globe who had been invited to the conference. As a media person I had a more comfortable seat but not the sofa style seats earmarked for the great and good.

Here was seated the Emir of Qatar and his entourage, President Ali Bongo of Gabon, former President Nicholas Sarkozy of France, Coe, Hugh Robertson, the British Sports Minister and various other sports dignitaries. To complete this picture of Qatar gathering together the good and great we also had Peter Mandelson there. But while Mandelson did not speak, he just sat and smiled, the rest of the good and great told us their views of sport. So the Emir of Qatar talked about the importance of sport; the President Bongo explained why some sportsmen are even more important than politicians in his country; Sarkozy revealed why he wanted 2022 to be held in Qatar and Blatter that sport is all about hope.

doha goals sofaThe sofa-style seats at Doha Goals were earmarked for the great and good

Qatar's hope is that such conferences, this was the second such conference I have attended in Doha this year, will show that Qatar is not only making history by being the first Muslim country to host the world's most popular sporting event but that it understands modern sport. Qatar knows that modern sport is a western, largely British and French, creation. And Qatar wants the world to understand that it can not only cope with this western invention but that it can set the sporting agenda in the decade ahead.

However, the problem for Qatar is the strong impression being formed that the Qataris are not happy to get the World Cup they also want to change the international sports calendar. So Michel Platini has spoken of a winter World Cup in 2022 and at the conference Sarkozy repeated word for word what Platini has been saying. Platini may deny that he was told by Sarkozy to vote for Qatar but listening to Sarkozy I got the impression that Platini has been reading from a script that the former French President drafted. Sarkozy for good measure also wants to change the summer dates for the Olympics.

To be fair to the Qataris have said nothing about a date change. However the longer this controversy carries on the stronger the impression will be created that not happy with staging the World Cup they want to take it over. That impression will not help Qatar gain credibility in the west, certainly not in the western media.

And this is where its lack of the plus-Mandela factor makes a difference. It now a cliché to say South Africa staged a fine World Cup. Yes, the World Cup mocked those who thought there would be chaos and confusion. However because of the plus-Mandela factor many of the problems of the World Cup were ignored or glossed over.

I am not talking of the pedestrian football, arguably the worst since Italia 90. That was hardly the South African organisers fault. But there were, as I recorded at that time, organisational problems. For instance the accreditation process was more elaborate than previous such events and nothing like as smooth as in London 2012. In South Africa you often had to go through irritating bureaucratic trap doors that were time consuming. And as I was getting my all important World Cup badge I was told that when a certain Pele arrived for his he was asked which country he came from. When the greatest footballer cannot be immediately identified as a Brazilian you realise jobs had been given to many people who were indeed very new to the game. All very good you may say in bringing World Cup benefits to people who had been so cruelly denied for so long but still very odd.

My most mystifying experience was the many laptop checks when I went to meet officials at public buildings and venues. I had to take out my laptop much as you are required to do airports. But even more than at airports I had to stand and wait while an official noted down the serial number of the laptop in a book. When I left the process was repeated with the official checking the laptop serial number against the entry made in the book. Initially, I thought this was to do with security concerns but it turned out to be a crime prevention measure stopping people walking away with laptops. In media centres this led to laptops being screwed to the tables, like old days in Fleet Street when typewriters were similarly secured.

Now in the overall scheme of things such glitches do not matter. But recall that Atlanta in 1996 got its bad reputation in the media from just such problems and it never recovered. However, so keen were we all to celebrate this much longed for dream of Mandela's rainbow nation, that few of us dwelled on them.

Qatar will not have any such media bonus. That is why it needs to make sure its World Cup message is clear. And this message will get lost if the controversy about a winter world cup in 2022 goes on. The Qataris may not have started it. But their friends and backers have. They need to tell us whether their friends are a proxy for them. If they are not then they should ask their friends to keep quiet so they can refine and focus on their 2022 message. Otherwise they will find for all the money they spend, and the conferences they hold, their message will be lost. They will not experience the glow South Africa did. And that would be a pity.

Mihir Bose is one of the world's most astute observers on politics in sport, particularly football. He wrote formerly for The Sunday Times and the Daily Telegraph and was the BBC's head sports editor. Most recently, he published The Game Changer: How the English Premier League came to dominate the world. Marshall Cavendish £14.99

Follow Mihir on Twitter.

www.mihirbose.com

Alan Hubbard: Football has learned nothing from the Olympics

Alan HubbardThe fact that Bradley Wiggins romped home in the BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards surprised no-one. Least of all himself, I imagine.

Eleven Olympians and Paralympians, plus a golfer who will be an Olympian in 2016, comprised the dozen who vied for the viewers' votes, a true reflection of Britain's sporting year.

No surprise either, that the so-called national sports, football, rugby and cricket, merited merely a passing mention.

In fairness, rugby and cricket came good in the past few weeks but even England beating the All Blacks at Twickenham and winning a Test series in India would not have eclipsed the achievements of those who starred in the Olympic Park and its satellite centres of sporting excellence last summer.

Football was summarily kicked into touch, and deservedly so. For it would have been a poisonous presence on the rostrum such has been its abominable misbehavourial pattern in 2012.

Ugly as it has become, co-host Gary Lineker still briefly referred to it as the Beautiful Game.

Was his tongue in his cheek? Maybe it was still beautiful when he and his contemporaries were lacing up their boots but it has since become scarred beyond recognition.

Recent incidents remind us just how toxic and tawdry it is, despoiled by racism, thuggery, arrogance and indiscipline.

Manchester City and Machester United fansManchester City and Manchester United fans separated by police during this derby this month

So many players have become rich and infamous, with no respect for the laws of the game on the field and an attitude off it which suggests they consider themselves immune to the laws of the land.

Ok we may have travelled so way from the mass hooliganism of the seventies and eighties (though you might doubt it when making inter-city train journeys carrying fans on match days) but the malady lingers on.

Now we have regular vile taunts about Munich, Hillsborough and the Holocaust almost every weekend, with a return to pitch encroachment by nutters.

Plus scenes like that in Manchester when Rio Ferdinand left the pitch with his eyebrow streaming with blood after being hit by a coin. Who says there's a recession when Neanderthal idiots happily throw away money? Football certainly isn't feeling the pinch.

Yet sadly it attracts the dregs of society who applaud the misdemeanours of players and fellow fans which are largely received with a shrug, a slap on the wrist and mealy-mouthed denunciation by the so-called guardians of the of the game.

The Premier League has been seduced by Murdoch money and mesmerised by celebrity culture, sacrificing both pride and principles, turning a blind eye to the fundamental ills of a game for which they, and the Football Association (FA), supposedly have a duty of care.

Both bodies appear to be happy to sit back, doff their caps to Mr Abramovich and co and watch it spin beyond their control as long as the bottom line is glowing with health.

Football has become a game which fosters the worst excesses of human kind.

Rio Ferdinand of Manchester UnitedRio Ferdinand was taken off the pitch after a coin was thrown at him from the crowd

Of course other sports are not squeaky clean. Cricket has a crime sheet full of betting scandals and rigged matches for which players have served jail sentences.

There was the deplorable use of the fake blood capsule in rugby, a plethora of pulled horses in racing, and as for cycling, well the all-conquering Brits may be clean (we hope) but principal dope peddler Lance Armstrong has put a spoke in the wheel. Endemic doping is a situation which continues to besmirch athletics too.

But at least governing bodies have been spurred into trying to do something about it, if in cycling's case the blind eye had to be prised open.

Football remains stubbornly myopic.

The fact that it also remains the only game where fans need to be segregated tell us something.

Those in charge say it is all about passion. Rubbish. It is unadulterated tribalism which too often breeds a hatred which spills over into violence and verbal abuse.

This is a sport I used to love but from which I am now totally disaffected. I retain fond memories of covering England's World Cup victory in 1966 and following West Ham when, under the celebrated Ron Greenwood, a team which included Bobby Moore, Martin Peters and Geoff Hurst played such sublime football.

Now fear not it has become so up itself, so consumed by greed and global marketing that it fails to see the dismay it causes among those, who like me, cherished the game for what it was.

Today it smugly harbours the incorrigible, the persistent cheats like those who appear to have been taking diving lessons from Tom Daley.

Yet too often those who make the rules look away when they see things which would not be tolerated in any other sport, encouraged by sycophantic TV interviewers and cheerleading commentators.

What we have witnessed since this grossly disfigured season began indicates that football has learned nothing from the Olympics, even though vowed it would.

Why this apparent reluctance to inject the sort of decency, dignity and real sportsmanship that epitomised the Olympics? Is it because those in charge have neither the will, nor the bottle? The Sports Minister Hugh Robertson was absolutely right when he said football was the worst governed of all sports.

His patience understandably is wearing thin and some Government intervention may be the only way forward.

Seb CoeDoes football need someone like Lord Coe to as an independent NFL-style commissioner?

What the game needs, but sadly is unlikely ever to get, is an independent NFL-style commissioner (Lord Coe would be my choice), who knows that the one way to stop the rot is to restore the authority of referees, deduct points in double figures, start closing grounds for several games and ban consistent offenders, both players and managers, for months rather than the odd game or two.

Drastic? Of course but football, is in need of major surgery to cure its incipient ailments, not the odd bit of casually applied sticking plaster accompanied by placebos and platitudes.

If anything requires a Levenson-style inquiry with the prospect of new regulations which necessitate statutory underpinning it is football.

Please, somebody blow the whistle.

Alan Hubbard is an award-winning sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday, and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Olympics, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire.

Andrew Warshaw: Football wasn't born in Qatar overnight just because of 2022

Andrew Warshaw ITGIt is just over two years since that momentous December day when Qatar stunned the footballing world by winning the race to stage the 2022 World Cup by a landslide.

At virtually every turn since, Hassan Al-Thawadi and his campaign team have had to cope with negative reporting about the methods used by the tiny Gulf state to achieve one of the most jaw-dropping results in the history of sports event bidding.

But if you think Al-Thawadi - the razor sharp, fast-talking English and American-educated lawyer who was, and still is, the public face of Qatar 2022 as he dashes round the world - is allowing all the whispers of suspicion, dirt digging and unproven allegations of corruption to halt Qatar's focus in its tracks, think again.

Sitting in his spotlessly clean yet surprisingly sparse office on the 37th floor of the downtown Doha building that houses both the burgeoning numbers of recruited 2022 World Cup staff and the Qatar Football Federation, Al-Thawadi concedes the criticism has been painful.

Hassan Al-Thawadi officeAl-Thawadi remains bemused by the scale of the backlash Qatar 2020 has received

Qatar may have spent big to get their message across and made mistakes along the way. But never having been proved to break any FIFA rules, Al-Thawadi remains bemused by the scale of the backlash and the number of misconceptions.

"There is no doubt the hurt is always going to be there," he explained.

"I welcome constructive criticism because, guess what, nobody's perfect.

"South Africa in 2010 was a great success on so many levels yet wasn't perfect.

"But if it's not constructive criticism all you can do is look at the glass as half full.

"I am learning about the school of hard knocks but all I am interested now is the future."

FIFA general secretary Jérôme Valcke's infamous leaked email suggesting last year that Qatar bought the World Cup set the ball rolling in terms of raising obvious questions over the bidding process and hardly helped the tiny Gulf state's cause.

Valcke's untimely comments were construed in different ways, however, with many seasoned observers reasoning that what he actually meant was that Qatar's huge marketing spend gave it a natural advantage over other 2022 contenders.

"You can look at virtually anything and draw inferences," Al-Thawadi argues.

"It's like the parody where six blind men are walking round an elephant and are asked to describe it. The point is, we know what we are doing and nothing will stop us. We have to keep our eyes on the ball. The minute we don't, people will say we can't deliver."

qatar blatter1Qatar were announced as the 2022 World Cup hosts in December 2010, becoming the first Arab, Middle Eastern or Muslim country to be awarded the right 

Despite the continuing picking away at Qatar's tactics, Al-Thawadi is determined to leave all the ill-feeling and negativity behind, however many times in the next few years the nation-building vision might take a hit.

Whether he likes it or not, however, the heat issue is unlikely to just disappear. Amid the growing clamour to switch the World Cup to the winter months, Al-Thawadi explains his personal thinking. "Look, it's very simple. We bid as a summer World Cup with cooling technology, [But] if the pillars of the football community come back to us and tell us winter or otherwise...then we will listen.

"But make no mistake, the cooling technology is a legacy concept. It opens up two thirds of the world to being able to enjoy their summers. Right now, the plan is still to hold the tournament in summer."

While the searing desert heat remains the main focus of the opposition camp, size comes a close second. The furthest distance between stadiums at 2022 is likely to be around 70 kilometres but Al-Thawadi doesn't see that as an issue either. The Olympics, he points out, stages 26 sports in one city. So, he argues, in the same way Qatar – half the size of Wales – will cope with millions of fans pouring into the country and snaking their way to the 12 stadiums, nine of which are being built from scratch starting in 2014.

He is not alone among key administrators in dismissing smallness as a problem. Sebastian Coe, the public face of London 2012, told the recent inaugural Doha Goals conference – aimed at using sport as a tool for positive change – that size did not necessarily matter and was certainly not an argument for knocking Qatar's success.

"It will be a mixture of the two," says Al-Thawadi. "It's a new concept, a bit like the Olympics but the feel will definitely be football. Fans will feel safe, they will feel secure, they will feel comfortable. They will also have a lot of fun. They will not only be physically cool; they will be cool in every sense."

Al Bidda TowerAl Bidda Tower is home to the Qatar 2022 Organising Committee

Pinned to a wall on a lower floor of the same building, known as the Al Bidda Tower, is a detailed planner outlining what is headed "Programme Wide Masterplan: Stage One Draft".

Al-Thawadi quickly intervenes to point out that this complex chart of diagrams and arrows is not for public consumption – except to certain staff and consultants already recruited.

But if anyone had any misgivings about Qatar's ability to pull off what many believe is mission impossible, this operational blueprint – covering infrastructure, stadium construction, environment, transport and a host of other organisational features – provides an immediate insight into the work that is already being carried out to bring the World Cup to the Gulf a decade from now.

As does the soon-to-be-released strategy document which covers, over 44 pages, the next three years, setting out operational goals and objectives of Qatar's programme during the initial 2012-2015 period. It's a complicated read but a useful exercise in ascertaining how out of the box, if you like, Qatar is thinking.

Legal and security committees have already been set up to provide crucial advice and feedback, all designed to create positive a impact and enhance the fan experience both at the stadiums and in entire neighbourhoods.

It seems a tall order, particular given Doha's ghastly traffic congestion with cars gridlocked at peak times and pretty bad throughout the rest of the day. One taxi driver told me that the problem was that everyone owned a car - and insisted on driving their own rather than sharing.

The horrendous jams, insists Al-Thawadi, will change completely once an entire metro and road network is constructed, with the first signs of the progress likely to be sometime in 2014. The combination of billions of dollars and fierce determination can go a long way.

"There is a significant amount of work that needs doing," concedes Al-Thawadi. "Tenders are already out for the first tunnelling phase but I look at it like a 400-metre race. Can you go flat out early? No. Can you build up to it slowly? No.

"It's a fine balancing act and the next 10 years are exactly like that. We are putting into place a decision-making process, up and down the chain, that is quick and efficient."

But what, I asked him, was Qatar going to do about its human rights record regarding migrant workers which is constantly questioned in the media and seems to be at odds with the vision of multiculturalism?

qtar 2022 constructionAl-Thawadi ensures that all construction contracts will have requirements that meet international standards

"This gets raised all the time and for me it's kind of strange because we have always said we are making a commitment towards the human and social elements which are very important," he responds. "In all constructions contracts there will be requirements that meet international standards."

Indeed, Al-Thawadi is fiercely proud of the legacy element that Qatar has promised. Last week's Doha Goals conference, pulling  together many of sports' leading decision makers and stakeholders, was a classic example of the passion being demonstrated to use sport as a tool for positive change, not just in Qatar but the entire region.

Much has been made already of the jaw-dropping Aspire Dome, the state-of-the-art multi-sport venue that is used both a training and coaching headquarters for aspiring young Qatari hopefuls and hand-picked African athletes being integrated into Qatari life, and as a conference centre to spread the message of positioning the oil-rich state as a true sporting hub.

Al-Thawadi insists Qatar's relentless quest to be taken seriously would have happened regardless of whether or not they won the right to stage the World Cup. Many punters had never heard of Qatar as a sporting destination prior to the bid but Al-Thawadi counters: "The World Cup might have been a catalyst but don't forget we have also bid for the Olympics and we've already hosted a string of major international sports events. Aspire got built years before the World Cup came on board. To dispel the myth very clearly, sport is within our DNA."

And football in particular. Al-Thawadi refutes the suggestion that Qatar doesn't deserve the World Cup because it has no footballing pedigree and has never qualified for the finals. "Football wasn't born here overnight just because of 2022. I don't buy the pedigree argument. Asia now has a strong standing in world football and it's not easy qualifying.

"Don't forget that in terms of club football Al-Sadd came from nowhere to win the AFC Champions League last year. That shows the pedigree is being built. Look how long it took Africa. We have only been in place since 1971 as a country."

Al-Sadd afc cahmpsQatar's leading club Al-Sadd won the AFC Champions League last year

Which is why the aspect of nation building is playing such a key role in 2022 planning, just as it did in South Africa in 2010. "We are perhaps on a scale no-one has seen before because the concept is not limited to the borders of Qatar and is about the entire Middle East," said Al-Thawadi. "We want the power of sport to break down stereotypical barriers."

But while the ideology might be for a Middle Eastern World Cup, Qatar has no intention of sharing the tournament with its neighbours. UEFA President Michel Platini, who has pushed through his plan for a pan-Continental European Championship in 2020, suggested recently that multiple hosting might also work for Qatar, the idea being to allow other Gulf states who could never stage the World Cup on their own to have a piece of the action.

But Al-Thawadi says this is not part of the grand plan and dismisses it outright. "It's not something that was part of our bid. For me it's a Qatari World Cup."

Which makes him even more determined to succeed, regardless of the tunnel vision he believes some of his critics may have. "When I look back - sleepless nights working on our final presentation and coming up with innovative concepts in our technical bid - I'm very proud of what we've done. After all, we were new to this whole industry; we didn't know anybody.

"When we won the bid on December 2, 2010, some of my closest non-Qatari friends rang me up in tears. Combining all the different cultures outweighs all the knocks we have taken. I have a pretty positive feeling that in time people will understand what we are trying to do too."

"We have a great concept and a great dream but the measure for me in terms of whether we are on the right path has always been commitment of the people and the operational staff who buy into the vision: people willing to work through thick and thin. That commitment is incredibly uplifting."

Andrew Warshaw is a former sports editor of The European, the newspaper that broke the Bosman story in the 1990s, the most significant issue to shape professional football as we know it today. Before that, he worked for the Associated Press for 13 years in Geneva and London. He is now the chief football reporter for insidethegames and insideworldfootball. Follow him on Twitter.

Mike Rowbottom: UK Sport - "Never mind the taking part, feel the medals..."

Duncan Mackay
Mike Rowbottom head and shouldersThe things they don't say. UK Sport: "It's all about taking part."

Any wild notions that, in the heady aftermath of the medal-rich London 2012 Games, the nation's elite funding regulators would kick back, take a chill pill and start talking about sport being all about enjoyment were brutally dismissed today as the new funding arrangements for Olympic and Paralympic competitors for the four-year cycle to the Rio 2016 Games were revealed.

On this occasion, they were literally revealed as eager UK Sport operatives stood ready to roll up the blinds on two display boards at either end of the press conference room within UK Sport's Russell Square HQ – and did so at the request of the redoubtable UK Sport chair, Baroness Sue Campbell.

Both the Olympic and Paralympic boards bore the headline "Mission 2016" – and that mission, it was soon confirmed, involved record investment of £347 million ($563 million/€427 million) to support Britain's Olympians and Paralympians to Rio and beyond, representing an overall increase from the London Games cycle of 11 per cent and targeting the high ambition of ensuring Britain became the first nation in recent Games history to better both its Olympic and Paralympic medal totals in the wake of hosting the event.

Rio 2016 with Christ the RedeemerUK Sport have set Team GB the target of winning more medals at Rio 2016 than they did at London 2012

Inevitably, there was a downside, as Campbell's early warning – "We had to ensure that every penny we invested in elite sport would produce the results that the public and our nation expected...it wasn't about being popular..." – had indicated.

For four Olympic sports – basketball, volleyball, handball and table tennis - it was more a case of Missin' 2016 as they were dropped from the main list of recipients. Meanwhile swimming and boxing were offered one-year deals on the understanding that they sorted out their governance – or in boxing's case, compliance – tout suite.

Hugh Robertson, Minister for Sport, declared himself "very relaxed" about the general position outlined.

"There is not a lot of point at this level funding teams who are not going to qualify for the Olympics," he said after the main press conference, "because the evidence of this summer is that what people like seeing is a successful Team GB. For all that we have more money available in the pot than we had before, we still need to make hard choices.

"So would you want to fund basketball teams, which are expensive, if they have no chance of qualifying for Rio, would you want to fund them and then take the money away from a cyclist or a rower who has a good chance of getting a medal?

"There isn't an endless pipeline. You have to make tough decisions. The evidence from this summer is that the British public like to see us winning, so they want us to back those who are going to win.

"If you have no potential of getting into the top eight in your Olympic sport you will not attract UK Sport funding, but that does not mean you will not attract Sport England funding, . And I am very relaxed about that.

"Where people have plans where they can demonstrate that they have real potential to participation, Sport England, will fund them. And there is now a proper talent pathway that leads up to the area where UK Sport could start funding. I think this is the first time this has ever happened."

Hugh Robertson with Team GB membersSports Minister Hugh Robertson backs UK Sport's "no compromise" approach

Robertson added that he had spent two and a half hours 10 days earlier in company with Campbell, UK Sport chief executive Liz Nicholl and Jennie Price, chief executive of Sport England, going through every sport and checking its suitability for UK Sport, and then Sport England funding.

"We made sure in those conversations that the talent pathways coming out of Sport England would join up with UK Sport funding," he said, before insisting that the new targets announced for Rio 2016 were "realistic".

Robertson maintained: "Casting our minds back to pre-London, it was looking extraordinary if we were going to do better than in Beijing. The main London target was just to get one more medal than in Beijing. That worked out very well.

"If you look at where we are now there are very few sports, when you analyse it, where you can see a reason for a huge fall-off in performance, and there are quite a few sports where we could very reasonably do better in Rio than we have done in London, so it's on that basis.

"When you go through it sport-by-sport, you can see the four or five sports that underperformed in London, and if we can get them back up in time for Rio it is perfectly reasonable to think that we might do better.

"None of those previous host cities invested as we plan to in the next Games.  That is the first mistake that we haven't made."

Robertson is currently engaged in trying to smooth the way for the creation of the proposed British Sports Marketing bureau, which Sir Keith Mills is hoping to launch early next year with the intention of levering private sponsorship for Olympic and Paralympic sports to supplement their current revenue streams from the Treasury and National Lottery ticket sales.

Sir Keith  Mills in front of BT logoSir Keith Mills is currently spearheading a new project to help raise sponsorship for some of Britain's smaller Olympic sports

The Sports Minister is currently trying to engage football, rugby league, rugby union, tennis and cricket in a project which is primarily aimed at benefitting less commercially huge Olympic and Paralympic sports.

"I've written to the professional sports this week," he said "It is wrong for all this purely to rely on public funding. The best possible way of doing this is to try and get all the sports together.

"Cycling obviously has its own arrangements with Sky, but we will try to do what we can to bring them on board. Frankly, if you are an Olympic sport I do find it hard to understand why you wouldn't want to make use of a man with the expertise of Sir Keith Mills.

"Athletics wants to do it all in house at the moment. But take your own view on this – would you rather have your sponsorship negotiated by an in-house team at UK Athletics or would you rather have Sir Keith Mills, a man who pulled in over £700 million ($1.1 billion/€860 million) to London?"

Robertson accepts that sports such as football will always want to retain the right to negotiate their own commercial rights, and that the big professional legions will also be keen to ensure no new group bargaining starts treading on their toes. But he remains optimistic.

"Am I absolutely certain that we will wrap this up? No. Am I reasonably comfortable? Yes. I am 100 per cent committed to the idea."

But whether the income stream is swelled by a new, private tributary or not, the Government – through UK Sport – has set an unprecedented course for ever greater tangible achievement at the Games.

The bubble is going to have to get bigger and bigger. Can you imagine which Government will want to announce that the record total of 758 British Olympic and Paralympic medals at the most recent Games cannot realistically be bettered, and that funding will be cut by 25 per cent accordingly. Not a big vote-winner, is it?

Robertson, grinning as he is probably very entitled to do, makes the point that the most recent successes were bedded in his party's decision two years ago to increase the cut which sport got from the National Lottery – a position which, he adds, was opposed by the Opposition.

"There isn't going to be a great new dollop of funding that is suddenly going to materialise," he said. "If you were to go back to sport getting 13.7 per cent out of the Lottery and not the 20 per cent it gets at the moment that would create a hole – you work out the chances of it being filled."

There are, of course, no guarantees in perpetuity.

"I'm a bit like the curator in a country house," Robertson concluded. "All I can do is look after it as best I can for the length of time that I'm in charge and hand it over in the best possible condition."

It has to be said that, as plans go in to extend both the west and the east wing, the country pile is looking in a very good state of repair right now.

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, the Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian.